USB full form Universal Serial Bus.
The
“Universal” means that the bus itself, and controllers for the bus don’t really
care about what the data is, and only concern themselves with transmission of
the data, and capabilities of hardware on both ends of transmission. RS-232 and
LP both tended to bog down hardware on having to do VERY specific things with
their data and how it is communicated, whereas USB is designed to abstract that
through controllers that just want to know what’s going in and going out,
simplifying the addressing and signaling requirements of hardware and driver
designers significantly as they can just ignore signal implementation details.
The
“Serial” is because the data is transmitted one piece at a time. This may seem
like it would be slower than a parallel bus, and in theory it would be, but one
of the biggest flaws in a parallel bus is that hardware has to be designed to
input and output each bit on its own line, making it more complicated to design
and more expensive in the end. Serial interfaces, especially USB, are very fast
now despite having to shift bytes one bit at a time, normally.
The “Bus” is, well, because it’s a bus. It’s a common signal
interconnect between hardware used to send and receive data. What’s nice about
USB is that it’s a bus that extends itself externally from the computer in an
addressable, tree-like manner, meaning multiple devices can connect via one
physical port on the machine, and there should be no conflict. Arguably the old
serial or parallel connections are not buses, as they weren’t really
addressable beyond what port on the computer is used, though in theory a device
and device driver could be written for those to make a sort of bus-like
protocol. Typically the old standards were designed with the idea that ONE
device used that connection and thus every signal going in and out was meant
for that one device, which to me means they weren’t bus standards.